Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5259 (JHR)

ABHINAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./945/2026 · 2026-02-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:4919 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 945 of 2026 Abhinay Kumar, son of Rabindra Kumar Roy, aged about 41 years, resident of Ward No. 8, Post Kandra, Panchayat Kandra, P.S. Kandra, District Seraikella Kharsawan ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate Ms. Harshikha Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P 02/ 19.02.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No. 11 of 2024, registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 506 of I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M at Seraikella. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that false allegation has been made against the petitioner of creating forged agreement dated 04.06.2020. He next submits that the complainant was in need of money and petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 7,00,000/- to the complainant and thereafter a registered sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 04.06.2020. He further submits that thereafter the petitioner came to know that the said land was sold to another person for that the petitioner has filed complaint case being Complaint Case No. 233 of 2023 against the complainant in which cognizance has been taken by the learned court by order dated 15.07.2025. He next submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 23 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of creating forged document. 5. The case is arising out of complaint case. Both sides have filed complaint case and cognizance has been taken in both the cases by the learned court and petitioner has no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 23 of the ( 2026:JHHC:4919 ) petition and in that view of the matter, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioners on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper. 6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. Dt.19.02.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-