Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52586 (KAR)

PRAKASH S. ANCHI v. THE CITY CORPORATION

WP/102026/2025 · 2026-01-28

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1040 WP No. 102026 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.102026 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: PRAKASH S.ANCHI, AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. ENGINEER AND CLASS 1 CONTRACTOR, R/O. AT POST. BUDIGOPPA, TAL. SAUNDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591119. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARAD M.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CITY CORPORATION BELAGAVI SUBHASH NAGAR, DIST. BELAGAVI-590016, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NORTH CITY CORPORATION BELAGAVI- 590016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER DATED 21/02/2025 AND 25/01/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE E AND F, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF PROHIBITION DIRECTING THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS TO REFRAIN FROM ISSUING WORK ORDER TENDER RELATING TO IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS OF AMAN NAGAR, TIRANGA COLONY, VANTAMURY COLONY, VEERBHADRA NAGAR AND AZAD NAGAR, BELAGAVI VIDE REFERENCE NO.DMA/2023- 2024/RD/WORK_INDENT17583/CALL-2. VIDE ANNEXURE-B. C) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT/ORDER OR DICTUM TO WHICH THE PETITIONER IS TURNED ENTITLED IN THE PRESENT FACT AND CIRCUMSTANCES. Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1040 WP No. 102026 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. It is stated in the memo that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. i. All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI YAN CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 117