CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 K.Buvaneshwaran ..Petitioner Vs The State represented through The Inspector of Police Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.236 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused (A8) on bail in Crime No. 236 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.A.P.Rajaprabhu For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.06.2026 for the alleged offence under section 311 of BNS in Crime No.236 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons threatened the de facto complainant and took away his car. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. At this juncture, learned Government counsel submitted that there are about 10 accused and this petitioner is arrayed as A8. He further submitted that A10 and de facto complainant were accused in some other case and that the de facto complainant came out of bail, since the de facto complainant has not taken any steps to get bail for A10, A10 got annoyed against the de facto complainant and wanted to commit dacoity and in furtherance thereof he took away his car and sold it to a third party, however, he fairly conceded that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); though there are serious allegation against the petitioner, considering the fact that this petitioner has been in incarcerated since 18.06.2026 and that the petitioner being a college student, and also upon the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that further custody for the purpose of investigation is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-2, Coimbatore, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and 05.30 p.m until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 22-07-2026 SHL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To: 1. The Judicial Magistrate-2, Coimbatore 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore 3. The Inspector of Police, Peelamadu Police Station, Coimbatore. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN J. SHL CRL OP No. 19572 of 2026 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis