Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5257 (JHR)

SACHIN MANDAL ALIAS KAPILDEO MANDAL ALIAS KAPILDEB MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1379/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:6229] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1379 of 2026 ------ Sachin Mandal @ Kapildeo Mandal @ Kapildeb Mandal, aged about 29 years, son of Binod Mandal, resident of Village- Bagicha Bandhukura P.O. + P.S.- Bounshi, District- Banka, (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Saraiyahat P.S. Case No.160 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111, 319 (2), 61 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 C and 66 D of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cyber- crime and used to cheat gullible persons by posing himself as a Bank Manager. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that there is no victim in connection with this case as yet. It is also submitted that one mobile phone and three SIM Cards have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.10.2025 as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dumka in connection with Saraiyahat P.S. Case No.160 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 10.03.2026-Animesh/