Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5255 (BOM)

BHAGWAT RAMCHANDRA BADAME v. NARSINGH KASHINATH PAWAR

CA/4402/2026 · 2026-08-27

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 983 ca 4402.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 983 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4402 OF 2026 IN SAST/9977/2026 BHAGWAT RAMCHANDRA BADAME VERSUS NARSINGH KASHINATH PAWAR ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jay Veer h/f. Anjali Dube ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 27.08.2026 P.C.:- 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 189 days caused in filing the appeal. 2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant. 3. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Appeal be registered. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] mubashir 2026:BHC-AUG:38952