SRI. CHANGALESHWARI SHIKSHAN MANDAL v. THE STATE FO KARNATAKA
WP/102134/2018 · 2026-02-03
K S Hemalekha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52526 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52526 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1532 WP No. 102134 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 102134 OF 2018 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHANGALESHWARI SHIKSHAN MANDAL YELLUR, BY IT’S CHAIRMAN, SRI. YALLOJI NARAYAN MAJUKAR, AGE: 74 YEARS, R/O. YALLUR, TAL AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590005.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.RAVIKUMAR GOKAKAKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE FO KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY IT’S SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, VIKAS SOUDH, BENGALURU-1.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, BANGALURU, NRUPTUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.06 10:35:17 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1532 WP No. 102134 of 2018
3.
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, RODDA ROAD, DHARWAD, TAL AND DIST: DHARWAD-580008.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTITUTION, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI, TAL AND DIST: BELAGVI-590001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-A I.E. THE ORDER DATED 24.02.2018 BEARING NO. G-5/SHSHIA/HUTUA/VIV/51/2017-18/3154 PASSED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT; ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE THIRD RESPONDENT, TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER MANDAL AS REFLECTED IN ANNEXURE-J DATED 08.01.2018 BEARING NO.G2/KHA PROU SHA/KHA HUTU/ANU/194/2017- 18/4630 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DIMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1532 WP No. 102134 of 2018
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo, which reads as under;
“That the respondent acceded to the request of the petitioner, concerned vacancies are already filled. Hence, the present petition is not pressed.”
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
PJ/Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57