SHARAD S/O. BALASAHEB JANGATE v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/79600/2013 · 2026-01-06
K S Hemalekha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52520 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52520 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:46 WP No. 79600 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 79600 OF 2013 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SHARAD S/O. BALASAHEB JANGATE AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORGAON, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGUM-590001.
2.
SRI. ANNA SAHEB S/O. RAMGONDA PATIL AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORGAON, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELGAUM-590001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINAND A.PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BELGAUM, DIST: BELGAUM-590001.
2.
THE ARIHANT SAHAKARI JAVALI GIRANI NIYAMIT, BORGAON, R/BY ITS CHIARMAN, SRI. RAOSAHEB S/O. ANNA SAHEB, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BORGAON, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELGAUM-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B.SOMAPUR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. N.D.GUNDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 11/06/2013 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.279/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN GRANTING CONVERSION /DIVERSION BEARING NO. KSH/LNA(3)/SR(I)-134/2012-13 DATED 04/03/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.07 11:19:03 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:46 WP No. 79600 of 2013
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner files a memo stating that this petition may be dismissed as become infructuous. The said memo reads as under :
“The petitioners respectfully submit as under:- In view of the lapse of time and subsequent developments, the top noted writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore the petitoners may kindly be permitted to withdraw the top noted writ petition. Hence, this memo.”
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
EM Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52