Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5251 (CAL)

MAFUJA KHATUN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/5494/2026 · 2026-03-27

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.03.2026 14 sdas WPA 5494 of 2026 Mafuja Khatun Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ujjal Ray Sk. Abdur Rahim ….. for the petitioner Mr. Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharyya Ms. Pramiti Bandopadhyay Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh …. for the WBCSSC Ms. Tapati Samanta …. for the State 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that in spite of being an eligible and meritorious candidate, she has not been sufficiently considered. 3. Since the counseling rounds are still in progress, I direct the respondent no. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner made on January 29, 2026, by April 15, 2026 and intimate the resultant order of consideration to the petitioner by April 25, 2026. 4. This order will not create any equity or right in favour of the petitioner. 2 5. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of. 6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)