- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:131 CRL.RP No. 100024 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100024 OF 2023 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRISHAIL S/O MUDAKAPPA HADAPAD AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. ARTAGAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST. BELAGAVI NOW R/O. C/O MUNIREDDY CMR BUILDING OPPOSITE, LAKSHMINARAYANANA TEMPLE AND GANESH BAKERY, 5TH MAIN MARATHAHALLI POST BENGALURU 560 037. …PETITIONER (SHRISHAIL-ABSENT) AND: BASANGOUDA S/O GIREPPAGOUDA KALINGOUDRA AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. URARGOL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST BELAGAVI 591110. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORD IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 85/2022 AND C.C. 1187/2017 IN CRL.A NO. 85/2022, DATED 18.10.2022 PASSED BY XI ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE BELAGAVI, IN CONFIRMING CONVICTION Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:131 CRL.RP No. 100024 of 2023 AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAUNDATTI IN C.C.NO. 1187/2017 DATED 23.02.2022, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT, PURSUING RECORDS HEREIN ON ARGUMENT OF THE PETITIONER COUNSEL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. The revision petitioner was earlier represented by learned counsel Sri.Satish S Raichur and however, by order dated 15.04.2025, Sri.Satish S. Raichur was permitted to retire in the presence of the revision petitioner. 2. This Court, by order dated 15.04.2025, granted one week's time to pay the balance amount of ₹50,000/- as agreed by the revision petitioner. On 16.04.2025, sum of ₹30,000/- was paid by the revision petitioner and the balance amount was not paid. The matter was re-listed on 22.04.2025. 3. On 22.04.2025, a joint memo was filed and matter was referred to Lok Adalat, but there was no settlement in the Lok Adalat. 4. The petitioner has failed to appear before this Court nor engage any other advocate. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:131 CRL.RP No. 100024 of 2023 5. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 29