Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5246 (JHR)

GULYA PAHARIA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1199/2026 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7195 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1199 of 2026 --------- Gulya Paharia, aged about 20 years, son of Surja Pahariya, resident of village Demchak, P.O. and P.S. Borio, Dist. Sahibganj. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. --------- 02/ 17.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that charge has been framed and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that one of the co-accused Budhna Pahariya @ Budhunath Pahariya, has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.09.2025, passed in B.A. No. 3202 of 2025. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 16.10.2024; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the period of custody of the petitioner coupled with the fact that co-accused, having same and similar allegation, has been granted bail by this Court; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the 2026:JHHC:7195 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj in connection with S.T. Case No. 16 of 2025 arising out of Borio P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 18.03.2026