Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52418 (KAR)

VISHWAS S/O. PRALHAD SUNDHOLI v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/76574/2013 · 2026-01-22

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:819 WP No. 76574 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.76574 OF 2013 (LA-KHB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VISHWAS S/O. PRALHAD SUNDHOLI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: BOND WRITER AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. 2. SRI. SAMEER S/O. PRALHAD SUNDHOLI , AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: BOND WRITER AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. 3. SRI. PRALHAD S/O. MADHWACHARYA SUNDHOLI, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: BOND WRITER AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ARUN L.NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE) AND: MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.24 11:28:23 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:819 WP No. 76574 of 2013 1. THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BELGAUM OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELGAUM TQ AND DIST: BELGAUM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELGAUM. 4. THE TAHASIDLAR GOKAK , DIST: BELGAUM. 5. THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHARMILA M.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. NANDINI B.SOMAPUR, AGA FOR R2 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 4(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT BEARING NO.PÀUÀȪÀÄA./¨sÀƸÁé«./18/2010-11 DATED 14.07.2010 AS PER ANNEXURE-E ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:819 WP No. 76574 of 2013 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo duly signed by the petitioners seeking to dispose of the matter in terms of the accepted proposal. Memo reads thus. MEMO Herein the petitioners beg to file this memo as under; That as per the letter dated: 11-02-2022 we expressed our proposal of 60: 40 Scheme by mentioning the plots numbers of our 40% scheme and we have also executed the consent deed dated: 11-02-2022 by agreeing for implementation of the 60: 40 scheme. The respondent No.1 has also agreed for the said proposal of 60: 40 scheme as proposed by us and accordingly the respondent No. 1 has communicated the acceptance letter to the petitioners the per as letter bearing No. ಕಗೃಮಂ / ಸಕಾಅ / ಬೆಳಗಾವಿ / ಭೂಸ್ವಾವಿ : ಗೋಕಾಕ : 21-22/730 dated: 14-02- 2022. The said letter is annexed to this memo for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. Hence it is most humbly prayed this Hon'ble Court to dispose of the above petition in terms of the said accepted proposal, in the ends of justice and equity.” 2. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA EM Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77