Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52410 (KAR)

SUNAGARA GANGAPPA v. SMT DURUGAMMA

RSA/223/2008 · 2026-01-12

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:306 RSA No. 223 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2008 (PAR) BETWEEN: SUNAGAR GANGAPPA SINCE DIED BY HIS LR’S. 1. SMT. RATHNAVVA W/O. LATE SUNAGARA GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HYARADA VILLAGE, HADAGALI TALUK, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. K. MANJULA W/O. NINGAPPA, D/O. LATE SUNAGARA GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HIREHADAGALI VILLAGE, HADAGALI TALUK, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT. 3. SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI W/O. NAGARAJ, D/O. LATE SUNAGARA GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SANDUR, BALLARI DISTRICT. 4. SUNAGARA PRAKASH S/O. LATE SUNAGARA GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HINDU, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, HOLALU VILLAGE, HADAGALI TALUK, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT. 5. ASHOK S/O. LATE SUNAGARA GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HYARADA VILLAGE, HADAGALI TALUK, Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:306 RSA No. 223 of 2008 VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GODE NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE.) AND: 1. SMT. DURUGAMMA WIFE TALWAR BHARMAPPA, MAJOR HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF HULIKATTI VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 2. SMT. NAGAMMA WIFE OF BUDANOOR BASAPPA, AGE: 40 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF HYARADA VILLAGE, HUVINAHADAGALI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT. 3. SMT. HANUMAVVA WIFE OF MURTHYAPPA, AGE: 38 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF HULIKATTI VILLAGE, HUVINAHADAGALI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT. 4. SMT. SAVITRAVVA WIFE OF TALWARA REVENAPPA, AGE: 38 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF HIREKOLACHI VILLAGE, HOOVINAHADAGALI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GANESH RAIBAGI, ADVOCATE.) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.72/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, (SR.DN) AND JMFC, HOSPET AND R.A.NO.6/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK-III, AT HOSPET, PERUSE THE SAME AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS, THROUGHOUT BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.10.2007 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK-III AT HOSPET, IN R.A.NO.6/2007 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2006 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND JMFC, HOSPET, IN O.S.NO.72/2004 AND DISMISS THE SUIT FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:306 RSA No. 223 of 2008 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that both parties have amicably settled the disputes between them, and the issues stood crystallized during the final decree proceedings. Therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the appellants is taken on record. 3. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE PMP /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54