HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35820 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Chandra Prakash Yadav, Advocate for Respondents-1 and 2 and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, Advocate for Respondents-3 and 4. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court that a second appeal filed under Section 19(3) of Right to Information Act, 2005 is still not decided. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent-Income Tax Department, submits that if there is no objection to filing of second appeal, it shall be decided by Appellate Authority expeditiously. 4. Taking note of above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of that if second appeal is in proper format and there is no defect, the same be decided in accordance with law expeditiously. September 9, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Yadav, Rakesh Kumar Pal, Ram Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ankur Agarwal, Chandra Prakash Yadav (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ramlal .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad