W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P No. 12748 of 2026 and WMP.No.13938 of 2026 The Central Public Information Officer Punjab National Bank, Circle office, PNB towers, 2nd Floor, No.46-49, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-6000 14 ..Petitioners Vs 1. Central Information Commission represented by its Information Commissioner, Ms.Anandi Ramalingam, Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka, New Delhi-110 067. 2. Sunit Kumar Agarwal Flat No.2610, 26th Floor, Tower B, Lodha White City, Near to Apex, Hospital Akurli Road, Damu Nagar, Lokhandwala, Kandhivali-East Mumbai, Maharashtra-400 101. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in 2nd Appeal No. CIC/ PNBNK/ A/ 2024/ 128787 and quash its order dated 18.11.2025 For Petitioner: Mr.P.Raghunathan for M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sanjay Central Government standing counsel for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 10 M/s.Sunit Kumar Agarwal party-in-person for R2 ORDER 1. The petitioner challenges the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the first respondent under Section 19(10) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 2. The second respondent had earlier filed W.P. No.1379 of 2024 seeking a direction to the petitioner, jointly and severally, to pay a sum of Rs.6,80,412/-, which is stated to have subsequently increased to Rs.13,60,824/-, towards professional fees allegedly due for legal services rendered by him, together with interest at the bank rate. 3. The petitioner disputed the claim for legal fees. Accordingly, by order dated 18.04.2024, this Court dismissed the writ petition and relegated the second respondent to approach the competent civil court for adjudication of the dispute relating to the settlement of professional fees. 4. Aggrieved by the said order, the second respondent has preferred W.A. No.1750 of 2024, which is still pending consideration. 5. Thereafter, the second respondent submitted an application dated 10.05.2024 under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 before the Central Public Information Officer seeking the following information: https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 10 “1) Details of the payment claimed by the bank of having made of bills Rs.48,272/- relating to conducting proceedings in MA.No.48/2018- DRAT Chennai-Indian Bank Vs PNB & BOB & Others related to then AR 16 Chennai:- Sr.N o. Details of the Bill and date Amount (Rs) Page No.1. 1. Bill dated 02.04.2019 25,612.00 As per page 63 2. Bill dt.02.04.2019 12,560.00 As per page 64 3. Bill dt. 07.01.2022 10,000.00 As per page 164 of writ 4. Bharatkosh dt 18.10.2022 receipt 100.0 As per page 183 of writ 5. Form 12 for Certified Copies (Rs.100 paid) As per page 184 of writ 6. Letter dt. 27.10.2022 with Sr.Mgr-Law endorsement to pay Rs.100.00 ----------- As per page 185 of writ 2) Details of the payment claimed by the bank of having made of bills for Rs.49,125/- relating to conducting proceeding in CC No.21/2020 and CC.No.22/2020 before FTC-I, MM Court, Egmore (Allikulam Building), Chennai in 138 NI Act proceedings against Mr.S.Prshanth of M/s.Kriss Associates in dishonour of two cheques each for Rs.40/- Lakhs in total fraud of about Rs.7.5 Crores of PNB BO: Purasawalkkam, Chennai:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 10 Sr.N o. Details of the Bill and date Amount (Rs.) Page No. 1. Consolidated list of pending bills for CC 21/2020 & 22/2020. 49,125.00 As per page 82 of writ 2. Bill dt. 16.11.2019. 10,000.00 As per page 83 of writ 3. Bill dt.16.11.2019. 6,750.00 As per page 84 of writ 4. Bill dt. 16.11.2019 2,250.00 As per page 85 of writ 5. Bill dt. 16.11.2019 325.00 As per page 86of writ -- -- -- Etc. 3) Details of the payment claimed by the bank of having made of bills for Rs.12,800/- relating to conducting proceedings before District Magistrate, Chennai in initiating proceedings u/s.14 SARFAESI Act, 2002 for taking physical possession of the property of Ms.Chelliah Naginthiran in the NPA A/c of M/s.Anmol Ferro Alloys of PNB:BO:Mylapore, Chennai:- Sr.No . Details of tbe Bill and date Amount (Rs.) Page No. 1. Bill dt. 03.09.2020 6,000.00 As per page 82 of writ 2. Bill dt. 03.09.2020 6,800.00 As per page 83 of writ 4) Details of the payment claimed by the bank of having made of bills for Rs.2,35,460/- relating to conducting proceedings before FTC-III, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 10 MM Court, Saidapet, Chennai in initiating proceedings n 22 cheque bouncing cases u/s.138 NI Act relating to different borrowers/NPA accounts of PNB:BO:Mylapore, Chennai:- Sr.No. Details of the Bill and date Amount (Rs.) Page No. 1. Bill dt. 12.07.2021 2,35,460.00 As per page 136 to 159 of writ 5) Details of the payment claimed by the bank of having made of bills for Rs.11,000/- relating to expenses incurred in getting the warrants served through Police Station, Mylapore, Chennai in proceedings before FTC-III, MM Court, Saidapet, Chennai u/s.138 NI Act relating to M/s.VOX Hospitality, an NPA accounts of PNB: BO: Mylapore, Chennai, consequent tot which the account was got compromised and closed. The details of bill dated 17.07.2020 are as under:- Sr.No. Details of the Bill and date Amount (Rs.) Page No. 1. Bill dt. 17.07.2020 11,000.00 As per page 110 of writ. 6. By reply dated 14.06.2024, the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) rejected the application under Section 7(1) of the Right to Information https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 10 Act, assigning various reasons. Aggrieved by the said rejection, the second respondent preferred a first appeal before the First Appellate Authority under Section 19(1) of the Act. The First Appellate Authority also rejected the appeal by reiterating the reasons assigned by the CPIO. 7. Thereafter, the second respondent preferred a second appeal before the Central Information Commission under Section 19(3) of the Act. By the impugned order, the Central Information Commissioner allowed the appeal and directed the Central Public Information Officer to revisit the RTI application and furnish a detailed, point-wise revised reply, based on the availability of the information sought, within 20 days. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order is a non-speaking order. It was contended that the Information Commissioner has not assigned any reasons for concluding that the reply furnished by the Central Public Information Officer was evasive and misleading. It is therefore submitted that, in the absence of reasons, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is liable to be set aside. 9. Per contra, the second respondent, appearing as Party-in-Person, submitted that the Information Commissioner has rightly held that the information sought under the RTI Act had not been properly furnished by the Central Public Information Officer and was justified in directing the CPIO to reconsider the application and furnish a detailed point-wise reply. It was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page7 of 10 therefore contended that the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. The second respondent further submitted that he is entitled to receive the balance amount towards professional fees and expenses, and that the petitioner, being the custodian of the relevant records, is under a legal obligation to settle the said dues. 10. I have considered the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record. 11. The claim of the second respondent for payment of professional fees and expenses is already the subject matter of W.A. No.1750 of 2024, which is pending before the Division Bench of this Court. Therefore, the issue relating to the liability of the petitioner to pay the alleged outstanding legal fees cannot be examined in the present writ petition. Consequently, the contention of the second respondent that the petitioner is liable to pay the balance legal fees does not arise for consideration in these proceedings and is accordingly rejected. 12. Insofar as the impugned order is concerned, the Information Commissioner has merely observed that the reply furnished by the Central Public Information Officer was evasive and misleading, without assigning any reasons in support of such conclusion. Since the Information Commissioner was exercising a quasi-judicial function, it was incumbent upon him to record https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page8 of 10 reasons for interfering with the order passed by the Central Public Information Officer. The absence of reasons renders the impugned order a non-speaking order and is in violation of the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the following order is passed: (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the first respondent is set aside. (iii) The first respondent is directed to reconsider the second appeal preferred by the second respondent on its own merits and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to both the petitioner and the second respondent. (iv) The above exercise shall be completed within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes Neutral Citation: Yes/No nvsri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page9 of 10 To 1.Central Information Commission represented by its Information Commissioner, Ms.Anandi Ramalingam, Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka, New Delhi-110 067. 2.The Central Public Information Officer Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, PNB towers, 2nd Floor, No.46-49, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-6000 14. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 12748 of 2026 __________ Page10 of 10 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. nvsri W.P No. 12748 of 2026 and WMP.No.13938 of 2026 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis