Subramani .R v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18835/2026 · 2026-07-17
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52387 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52387 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 and Crl.MP.No.12531 of 2026
1. Subramani .R S/o. Ramannan, 4/115, BC Pudur, Mekalachinnampalli, Krishnagiri - 635 120. 2. Vineetkumar .S S/o. Subramani, 4/115, BC Pudur, Mekalachinnampalli, Krishnagiri - 635 120. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Maharajakadai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Cr.No.141 of 2026. 2. Krishnaveni W/o. Anbalagan, 288(1),BS Raman Kudiyurupu, Mekala Chinnampalli, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This criminal original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records culminating in Cr.No.141 of 2026 on the file of 1st Respondent and quash the same and pass such further order or other orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.N.SINEGA For Respondent(s):
Mr.M.MOHAMED RIYAZ GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE) FOR R1 ORDER The criminal original petition is filed to quash the FIR in crime No.141 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent. 2.Upon considering the FIR, it can be seen that there is dispute between adjacent land owner, on account of which, it is alleged that the accused had attack the de facto complainant with hands and legs and the case is registered for the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is also counter case that is registered at the behest of the petitioner’s herein. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4.Considering the said submission, it can be seen that separate occurrences are alleged. Therefore, let both the cases be investigated dispassionately by the investigating officer. Since the submissions made that the case is false case is factual in nature, keeping open the liberty of the petitioner to raise the same at the appropriate stage, the prayer to quash the FIR itself cannot be entertained. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms To
1. The Inspector of Police, Maharajakadai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Cr.No.141 of 2026. 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sms CRL OP No. 18835 of 2026 and Crl.MP.No.12531 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis