SANTOSH KUMARI v. THE SERCRETARY JAL SHAKTI VIBHAG AND OTHERS
CWP/1024/2026 · 2026-01-09
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5237 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5237 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.1024 of 2026
Decided on: 09.01.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Santosh Kumari
....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors
. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Shagun Sharma, Advocates.
For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain defects in the pleadings of the writ petition and some necessary documents germane to the case have also not been appended, he therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law.
2.
Granting such liberty, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
- 2 -
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge January 9, 2026 R.Atal