Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5234 (RAJ)

SAJID S/O TAIYYAB v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2937/2026 · 2026-03-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9672] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2937/2026 Sajid S/o Taiyyab, Aged 25 years, R/o Dudawal, P.S. Nagar, District Deeg. (At present confined in Jail, District Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.279/2025 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and the co- accused Aasif, who is named in the FIR has already been released on bail by the learned Trial Court. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Though one case has been reported as criminal antecedent against petitioner but of different nature. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since [2026:RJ-JP:9672] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2937/2026] 31.01.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sajid S/o Taiyyab, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/75