HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35419 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Yadav, Sri M.Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vibhu Rai for respondent nos.3 and 4. . 2. Court does not find conduct of petitioner to be bonafide since he has changed his Advocate on the date of hearing, still in the interest of justice I have perused the impugned order whereby the Appellate Authority under Nagar Niyojan Adhiniyam 1973 has declined to grant interim relief and matter was fixed for hearing on 12.8.2026 and on said date it was not heard and it is informed that next date fixed is 5.10.2026. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, considering that it is a case of demolition, therefore, it is observed that Commissioner, Prayagraj shall hear the matter on the next date fixed for hearing. 4. So far as records are concerned, it is directed that if it is already not sent by concerned authority, be sent to the Appellate Authority before the next date of hearing and while considering the appeal, issue in regard to actual land of petitioner shall also be taken note of considering para Cha. as well as nature of area as referred in paragraph no.5 of memo of appeal. 5. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. September 8, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vibhu Rai (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Sanjay Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad