- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:334-DB WP No. 39428 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 39428 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KAVITHA M., W/O MADHUSUDANA R., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, WORKING A REVENUE INSPECTOR, BOMMANAHALLI CIRCLE, BEGURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU. R/AT No.82, NEW LAYOUT, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, B.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPRTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001. Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:334-DB WP No. 39428 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BENGLURU-560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TQ., KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SHIVAREDDY, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER SETTING ASIDE THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 04/12/2025 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION No.4813/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A REJECTING THE INTERIM PRAYER AS BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND VOID. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Sri. Chandrakanth R. Goulay, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to urge the grounds herein before the Tribunal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:334-DB WP No. 39428 of 2025 2. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Sri. Chandrakanth R. Goulay, learned counsel would submit that the matter is listed on 13.01.2026 for hearing before the Tribunal and he seeks for a direction to the Tribunal to dispose of the application on the said date. 4. Disposal of the application depends on various factors including filing of statement of objection by the State. If the objection to the application is filed on the said date, we request the Tribunal to dispose of the application on the said date or on the subsequent date. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10