Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5231 (CAL)

SUJIT MONDAL @ SADHAN AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2490/2025 · 2026-02-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.02.2026 Serial no. 236ML [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2490 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with ST No. 4(7) of 2024 arising out of Swarupnagar Police Station Case being No. 514 of 2023 dated 16.08.2023 u/s 447/325/326/307/302/354B/509/506/34 of the IPC. -And- In the matter of : Sujit Mondal @ Sadhan & Anr. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu Md. Jannat ul Firdous Mr. Rajsekhar Hota … for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Sonali Das Ms. Rituparna Saha … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for two years five months and out of the proposed 28 witnesses, 13 witnesses have been examined till date. Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the vital blow was inflicted by the present petitioners. I have taken into account the deposition which has been recorded as also the materials in the case diary. Having considered the same, I am of the view that so far as the charges under Section 103 of the BNSS is concerned, the locus of the present petitioners cannot be 2 distinguished from the other persons who have been enlarged on bail in connection with the instant case. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Sujit Mondal @ Sadhan and Sankar Mondal shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Basirhat. If on bail, the petitioners shall also make themselves physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior intimation to the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2490 of 2025 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3