Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 523 (ALL)

SURAJ AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

CRLP/5111/2026 · 2026-03-17

Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Rajeev Misra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5111 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned AGA representing State-respondent 1, 2 and 3. 2. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner Suraj and another have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 25.01.2026 lodged by first informant/respondent 4 Sakil and registered as Case Crime No. 10 of 2026, under section 137(2), 87 BNS, 363, 366 IPC, Police Station Hazara, District Pilibhit. 4. After some arguments the learned counsel for petitioners submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. 5. Learned AGA representing State-respondents 1, 2, 3 has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners. 6. In view of above, the present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. March 18, 2026 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Suraj And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad