Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5227 (KAR)

M/S VALSALA TRAVELS PVT LTD., v. SMT K R GEETHA

CRL.RP/502/2026 · 2026-04-24

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22805 CRL.RP No. 502 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 502 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. M/S VALSALA TRAVELS PVT. LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE AT SURVEY, NO.2/5, SAJJEPALAYA, SRIGANDADAKAVALU, VISHWANEEDAM POST, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560091 2. SRI K. DINESH S/O LATE A.P.ANANDAN, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OF M/S VALSALA TRAVELS PVT LTD., CORPORATE OFFIE AT SURVEY, NO.2/5, SAJJEPALAYA, SRIGANDAADAKAVALU VISHWANEEDAM POST, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU 560091 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. K. R. GEETHA W/O B.V.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.4252, PHONEX- 1, TOWER-4, BENGALURU WEST, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR ' Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22805 CRL.RP No. 502 of 2026 BENGALURU - 560 10 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2025 PASSED BY THE LX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.1877/2024 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE XXIII A.C.J.M BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.37194/2022 DATED 01.07.2024 CONVICTING THE APPELLANT FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT AND SENTENCING HIM TO PAY A FINE OF RS.35,00,000/- AND IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE, TO UNDERGO S.I FOR A PERIOD OF 06 MONTHS AND THEREBY DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.37194/2022. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo reporting the death of petitioner No.2 who was the only authorised signatory of petitioner No.1/company. As such, as of now there is nobody who would represent petitioner No.2. 2. Noting the same, petition is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11