Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52263 (MAD)

V.Vishnuprasad v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/27308/2026 · 2026-07-16

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27308 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27308 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 29906 OF 2026 1. V.Vishnuprasad S/o. Venkadesan, 1461 Samattiyar Street, Sathammampattu, Silambinathan Pettai PO, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore district 2. Krishnaprasad S/o. Venkadesan, Minor Rep. by his natural Guardian mohter Sathiyabama, 1461 Samattiyar Street, Sathammampattu, Silambinathan Pettai PO, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore district ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Cuddalore district 2. The block Development officer Panruti Panchayat Union, Panruti, Cuddalore district 3. The Tahsildar Panruti, Cuddalore district ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27308 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to measure the petitioners land situated in New S.No. 2/2A (Old S.No. 278/3 , 4, 5, 6) to an extend of 1.46 ares situated in Sellambinathan Pettai village, Cuddalore Taluk and district and forbear the respondents from laying road in the said land For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Ramachandran For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 & 3 Mr.V.Chandraprabu, Govt. counsel for R2 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 27.04.2026. 2. Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 1st & 3rd respondents and Mr.V.Chandraprabhu, learned Government’s counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 27.04.2026 before the 3rd respondent, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27308 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 requesting them to measure the petitioners’ subject land land and forbear the respondents from laying road in the said land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the 3rd respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner dated 27.04.2026 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 16-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27308 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Collector Cuddalore district 2. The block Development officer Panruti Panchayat Union, Panruti, Cuddalore district 3. The Tahsildar Panruti, Cuddalore district https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27308 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 27308 of 2026 16-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis