Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5223 (RAJ)

JAHID QURESHI ALIAS KAYYA S/O NASRUDDIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6885/2024 · 2026-03-19

Shubha Mehta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11706] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6885/2024 Jahid Qureshi Alias Kayya S/o Nasruddin, Aged About 29 Years, R/o House Number B-86, Madina Nagar, Police Station Khohnagoriyan, District Jaipur At Present Tenant At Rahim Nagar, Police Station Khohnagoriyan, District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/03/2026 ;kph dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 371@2024 iqfyl Fkkuk [kksukxksfj;ku&t;iqj vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@21 ,uMhih,l ds izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk eksVjlkbZfdy la[;k vkjts60&,l-,Q-&3677 dks lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA cgl lquh xbZA ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,d izdj.k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 371@2024 iqfyl Fkkuk [kksukxksfj;ku ij ntZ gqvk Fkk] ftlesa /kkjk 8@21 ,uMhih,l ds vUrxZr vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ mDr okgu dk iathd`r Lokeh gSA mudk dguk gS fd ,uMhih,l ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr ntZ izdj.k esa ;fn dksbZ okgu tCr fd;k tkrk gS] rks ,sls okgu dks Hkh lqiqnZxh ij NksM+k tkuk pkfg,A vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p; izLrqr fd;s x;s& 1. Sainaba vs. The State of Kerala & Anr. 2022 0 Supreme (SC) 1181 2. Babulal Yogi vs. NCB [2026:RJ-JP:11706] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6885/2024] 2024:RJ-JP:34359 3. Bhikaram vs. State of Rajasthan 2025:RJ-JP:3041 4. Hariom Prajapati vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 7836/2024 Raj. High Court fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kph Lo;a vfHk;qDr gS vkSj okgu dks ,uMhih,l ls lacaf/kr ekeys esa tCr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds laca/k esa vfHkxzg.k dk izko/kku Hkh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa okgu dks lqiqnZxh ij ugha fn;k tkosA mHk; i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;kA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 371@2024 iqfyl Fkkuk [kksukxksfj;ku&t;iqj vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@21 ,uMhih,l esa okgu eksVjlkbZfdy la[;k&vkjts&60 ,l,Q 3677 tCr fd;k x;k gS] ftldh QnZ tCrh i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA izdj.k esa vkjksii= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA mDr okgu tkfgn dqjS'kh ds uke iathd`r gksuk ik;k x;k gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vius U;kf;d fu.kZ; Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat (2002) 10 SCC 283 esa fuEu fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "........ has held that the vehicle should not be permitted to remain parked in the police station as same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful." mi;qZDr U;kf;d fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vk/kkj ij gh U;kf;d fofu'p; 1. Sainaba vs. The State of Kerala & Anr. 2022 0 Supreme (SC) 1181, 2. Babulal Yogi vs. NCB 2024:RJ-JP:34359, 3. Bhikaram vs. State of Rajasthan 2025:RJ-JP:3041, 4. Hariom Prajapati vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 7836/2024 Raj. High Court esa okgu dks lqiqnZxh ij fn;s tkus ds vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gSaA [2026:RJ-JP:11706] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6885/2024] okgu yxHkx 2 o"kZ ls tCr gS] ftlds [kqys esa iM+s jgus ls [kjkc gksus dh vk'kadk gSA vU; fdlh Hkh O;fDr dh vksj ls iz'uxr okgu lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus gsrq vc rd dksbZ Dyse ugha fd;k x;k gS ,oa u gh vU; dksbZ izfrdwy ifjfLFkfr;kWa U;k;ky; ds le{k mtkxj gqbZ gSaA vfuf'pr le; rd okgu ds [kM+k jgus ls mlds {kfrxzLr ,oa vuqi;ksxh gksus dh lEHkkouk gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa] ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofu'p; esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;kph dks iz'uxr okgu lqiqnZxh ij iznku fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkykSP; vkns'k fnukafdr 3-7-2024 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;kph dh vksj ls 1]00]000@&:i;s v{kjs ,d yk[k :i;s dk lqiqnxhZukek o blh jkf'k dk ,d tekurukek fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds lUrks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djk;s tkus ,oa ;g v.MjVsfdax fn, tkus ij] fd og okgu dks nhxj txg jgu] o;] varfjr ugha djsxk] U;k;ky; }kjk ryc fd, tkus ij Lo;a ds O;; ij mls U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djsxk] mlds jax&:i esa dksbZ ifjorZu ugha djsxk] izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk eksVjlkbZfdy uEcj vkj ts 60 ,l ,Q 3677 dks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p; AIR 2003 SCC 638 Sunder Bai Amba Lal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat esa izfrikfnr fn'kk&funsZ'kksa dh ikyuk djrs gq, ;kph dks lqiqnZxh ij iznku dj fn;k tk,A (SHUBHA MEHTA),J JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /8