Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52212 (MAD)

E.RAVI v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/28009/2026 · 2026-07-21

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 28009 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 28009 of 2026 E.Ravi S/o.Irulappan, No.304, Parvathypuram, Thiruneermalai Main Road, Chrompet, Chennai- 044. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District. 2. The District Revenue Officer O/o.The District Collector Office, Nagapattinam. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer Nagapattinam, RDO, Nagapattinam District. 4. The Tahsildar Nagapattinam District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to consider the petitioners application dated 02.07.2023 and issue the patta to the petitioner in Survey No.224/ 21-B, to an extent of 0.05cents of land, after surveying the property situated at Nirthamangalam Village, Vadavur Union, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28009 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Ayyadurai For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt. counsel Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 02.07.2023. 2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 02.07.2023 before the respondents, requesting them for issuance of patta, pertaining to the subject property, in favour of the petitioner. However, the said application was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s application will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28009 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 4th respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 02.07.2023 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 9. Post this matter on 27.08.2026 for reporting compliance. 21-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA Note: Issue order copy on 23.07.2026 To 1. The District Collector Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District. 2. The District Revenue Officer O/o.The District Collector Office, Nagapattinam. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28009 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 3. The Revenue Divisional officer Nagapattinam, RDO, Nagapattinam District. 4. The Tahsildar Nagapattinam District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28009 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 28009 of 2026 21-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis