UTTARAKHAND STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION v. PRAMOD KUMAR
SPA/94/2024 · 2026-05-08
Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5221 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5221 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:3527-DB
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
0 8 TH MAY, 2 0 2 6
SPECI AL APPEAL No. 9 4 OF 20 2 4
Uttarakhand State Warehousing Corporation.
…Appellant Versus
Pramod Kumar and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the appellant.
: Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel.
Counsel for respondent nos. 1 &
2. : Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel.
JUDGMENT : (per Sh r i Man oj Ku m ar Gu p t a, C.J.)
1.
The instant intra-court appeal is directed against the
order dated 14.03.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S/ S) No. 3495/ 2018, whereby the Writ Petition filed by non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 herein has been disposed of, quashing the order impugned in the Writ Petition dated 28.06.2017, by which the appellant has rejected the request of non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 for regularization of their services, on the ground that the Regularization Rules of 2016 had been stayed by this Court, by order dated 24.01.2017 passed in Writ Petition (S/ S) No. 154/ 2017, and consequently their services cannot be regularized, with further direction to the appellant to regularize the services of non-appellant nos.1 & 2. 1
2026:UHC:3527-DB
2.
The short submission of learned counsel for the appellant-Corporation is that, although the stay order dated 24.01.2017 passed in the Writ Petition has merged into final
order dated 22.02.2024, the effect of which is to amend the Regularization Rules to a limited extent, but in such an event, the Corporation should have been given liberty to consider the case of non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 for regularization. He submits that there was break in service of non-appellant no. 1 and non-appellant no. 2, does not fulfill the criteria laid down under the Regularization Rules. As the Regularization Rules remained stayed, therefore, the appellant-Corporation did not get any opportunity to place these facts before the writ Court. It is submitted that the appellant-Corporation has no objection in considering the case of non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 for regularization, as per the Regularization Rules, 2013, as amended on 05.12.2025, on basis of directions issued by this Court by judgment dated 22.02.2024 passed in Writ Petition (S/ B) No. 616/ 2018 and connected matters.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 very fairly states that he has no objection in case the order of learned Single Judge is modified to the aforesaid extent. He submits that non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 be given 2
2026:UHC:3527-DB
liberty to file fresh representation, and state complete facts before the appellant-Corporation. He also prays that a specified time frame be fixed for deciding the plea of regularization of services of non-appellant nos. 1 & 2.
4.
Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, the instant intra-court appeal is disposed of as follows : - (a) The order of learned Single Judge is set-aside to the extent it directs the appellant-Corporation to regularize the services of non-appellant nos. 1 & 2. (b) Non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 are granted liberty to file fresh representations, along with supporting evidence, within four weeks, along with attested copy of the instant order before the appellant- Corporation, seeking regularization of their services. (c) The appellant-Corporation will pass a speaking
order on the said representations within a further period of four weeks.
5.
Dependent upon the outcome of the representations filed by non-appellant nos. 1 & 2, for regularization of their services, non-appellant nos. 1 & 2 would be entitled to consequential benefits, if any. 3
2026:UHC:3527-DB
6.
All pending applications stand
disposed of accordingly.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 08th May, 2026 Rahul 4
RAHUL PRAJAPATI Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3e66 e61bf4c848741983ed8c39e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8A19 2FCAD15C390A1AAD7B39857D2540AE4C28A4 898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2026.05.08 14:42:08 +05'30'