BHAIRAM YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/16702/2026 · 2026-09-08
Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16702 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. At the very outset, Ms. Sabana Azami, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioners upon which cognizance has also been taken by the learned Magistrate, as such this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. This writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous September 9, 2026 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Sabana Azami Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Hira Lal (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Bhairam Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad