Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5220 (KAR)

SRI SADIQ SAB v. SRI H S ASHOKA

WP/632/2022 · 2026-04-29

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24068 W.P. No.632/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.632/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. SADIQ SAB S/O ABDUL HUSSAIN SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT SADIYA MANZIL, 4TH BLOCK VIVEKANANDA EXTENSION MADUGIRI TOWN - 572132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. H.S. ASHOKA S/O SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT. K.R. EXTENSION MADHUGIRI TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT - 573132. 2. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O T.M. LAKSHMIKANTHA SETTY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 3. SRI. LAKSHMIKANTHA SETTY HUSBAND OF RESPONDENT NO 2 AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. 4. SMT. THRIVENI D/O T.M. LAKSHMIKANTHA SETTY Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24068 W.P. No.632/2022 AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 5. SRI. M.L. LAKSHMISHA S/O T.M. LAKSHMIKANTHA SETTY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 6. SRI. VINAY S/O T.M. LAKSHMIKANTHA SETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT 3RD BLOCK K.R. EXTENSION, MADHUGIRI TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT 572132. 7. THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA BYALYA BRANCH MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, ADV., FOR R1 NOTICE TO R2 TO R7 DISPENSED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN EX NO.33/2012, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MADHUGIRI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.18.12.2021 PASSED IN EX NO.33/2012 IN PERMITTING THE OBJECTOR/R-1 TO MARK THE UNREGISTERED AADHARA PATRA MORTAGAGE DEED DTD.21.06.2011 ANNEXURE-A BY ALLOWING THIS W.P. & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24068 W.P. No.632/2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that Ex.No.33/2012 has been disposed of as the matter has been settled out of Court. 2. In view of the said statement and memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22