- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1256 RFA No. 2951 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2951 OF 2025 (POS-) BETWEEN: SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR SUTRAVE S/O SRI. AMARNATH SUTRAVE, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. 402, NIRVANA-2 APTS, 4TH FLOOR, APARTMENTS, NO. 14, 1ST CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGARA, ANNAYAPPA LAYOUT, VIMANAPURA POST, KONENAAGRAHARA, BENGALURU - 560 017 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHUVANENDRA RAJU P, ADVOCATE AND SRI. P.B. RAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. JAYASHEEL REDDY G S/O K. GOPAL AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 121, 7TH AVENUE, RAINBOW RESIDENCY, JUNNASANDRA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 035. 2. SRI. G. NARAYANA SWAMY S/O GOVINDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1256 RFA No. 2951 of 2025 RESIDING AT NO. 88, MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 068. 3. SRI. K. VENKATESH (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN) AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 402, 4TH FLOOR, NEW BBMP MUNICIPAL NO. 14/13 'NORVANA II RESIDENCY', KONENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 26.12.2025, NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S. 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.12.2025 PASSED IN EX. NO. 25171/2025, ON THE FILE OF THE C/C. LVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE IA NO. 2 FILED U/O XXI RULE 97 TO 103 R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC. INTIME CF SUFFICIENT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1256 RFA No. 2951 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT The captioned appeal arises out of an order passed on an application filed under Order XXI Rule 97 of the CPC in Ex.P.No.25171/2025. 2. Today, a joint compromise petition is filed by the appellant/obstructor and respondent No.1/decree holder. Both the appellant and respondent No.1 are personally present before this Court. Upon due query, both parties state that they have carefully read and understood the terms and conditions of the compromise petition. They further affirm that the compromise has been entered into voluntarily, without any coercion, undue influence, or pressure from any quarter, and that they have agreed to amicably resolve the dispute and give a quietus to the litigation. 3. Being satisfied that the compromise arrived at between the parties is lawful and voluntary, the joint compromise petition is taken on record. The compromise - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1256 RFA No. 2951 of 2025 petition shall be treated as part and parcel of the decree. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal stands disposed of in terms of the joint compromise petition. The Registry is directed to draw the decree strictly in accordance with the terms of the compromise. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17