MUCHKUND DAS ALIAS MUCHKUN DAS ALLIAS MOCHKUND DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1348/2026 · 2026-03-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5214 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5214 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:6330] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1348 of 2026
------ Muchkund Das @ Muchkun Das @ Machkund Das, Aged about 35 years, Son of Late Chhoti Das, Resident of Village Tanderi Malmala, P.O. & P.S.- Pathrol, District- Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-10-03-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D & 84C of the I.T. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of financial fraud and cybercrime by using forged SIM- Cards. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and there is no victim in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.11.2025 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 27.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 972 of 2026 and the order dated 27.02.2026 in B.A. No.964 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 10.03.2026 Saroj/