Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5214 (BOM)

MARGU NAGAPPA DHOTRE AND ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.

CA/8963/2026 · 2026-08-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ca-8963-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8963 OF 2026 IN FA/1194/2020 Margu Nagappa Dhotre and Ors. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through the Collector, Osmanabad and Ors. ….. Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8964 OF 2026 IN FA/1192/2020 Mahadeo Lahu Gund. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Osmanabad and Ors. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1193 OF 2020 The Ex. Engineer, Irrigation Department Strenghtening Division, Omerga and Ors. VERSUS Rajaram Dadarao Wadane ….. CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :- . Not on board. Taken on board. 2. This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of order dated 19.08.2026. 2026:BHC-AUG:37629 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // 2 ca-8963-2026 3. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in paragraph no.5 of the said order, the words “solvent surety” have inadvertently been mentioned instead of “solvent security”. She submits that the the said correction be made in order dated 19.08.2026. 4. In view of the above, the words “solvent surety” be replaced by words “solvent security”. Corrected order be uploaded. 5. Motion stands disposed of in above terms. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2026 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //