Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5214 (AP)

ANSARI SALEEM, GUNTUR DIST. v. P.P., HYD & ANO

CRLRC/667/2015 · 2026-07-13

Sunitha Gandham

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of pronouncement : 14.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15.07.2026 APHC010011922015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 667/2015 Between: 1. ANSARI SALEEM, GUNTUR DIST., S/O. SARDAR OCC: BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 4-11-13 RAILWAY STATION ROAD NIDUBROLU GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. P P HYD ANO, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P. HYDERABAD 2. AMARA NAGA RAJU KUMAR, S/O. LATE NARAYANA RAO OCC: BUSINESS R/O. NEAR GANDHI STATUE CENTER MAIN ROAD PONNUR GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 09.04.2015 in Crl.M.P.No. 48/2015 in C.A.No.164/2015 passed by the Hon'ble III Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1105 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 9-4-2015 in Crl.M.P.No.48/2015 in C.A.No. 164/2015 passed by the Hon'ble III Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur and sentence imposed by the Hon'ble Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ponnur by order dated 23- 3-2015 in C.C.No. 99/2013 pending disposal of this Criminal Revision Case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.667 OF 2015 ORDER: Sri Shaik Altaf, learned counsel, who is representing Sri Syed Khader Mastan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, submitted that the matter is already settled out of Court and sought permission to withdraw this revision. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 14.07.2026 Vns Whether the order is : ✓ Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No