Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52129 (MAD)

Vinith v. State by Inspector of Police

CRL MP/8097/2026 · 2026-07-21

M Nirmal Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl. M.P. No. 8097 of 2026 in Crl. A. No. 596 of 2026 Vinith ... Petitioner Vs. State by: The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Mangalamedu. (Crime No. 38 of 2022) ... Respondent To suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner in Spl.S.C.No.66 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur, judgment dated 17.06.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr. S. Nirmal Aditya For Respondent : Ms. Sharada Vivek, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 10.06.2026, the petitioner’s sentence was suspended for a limited period of 30 days to facilitate the registration of the marriage before the Registrar of Marriages 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 and to report compliance before this Court for further orders. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that although the petitioner was ready to marry the victim, it was the victim and her mother who were not cooperating for the marriage. 3. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate strongly opposed the petitioner’s contention and filed a status report received from the Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu Police Station. It was submitted that the victim was enquired by the respondent police and had given a statement stating that, although the petitioner had represented before this Court that he was willing to marry her and take care of both the victim and the child, after his release on interim bail, he had completely changed his stand. Despite several attempts made by the victim and the police, the petitioner not come forward for the marriage instead became emboldened to state that he would not marry the victim, irrespective of the consequences. The handwritten statement given by the victim has been produced by the Inspector of Police, Mangalmedu All Women Police Station, is extracted hereunder: 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 4. In view of the above, this Court finds that the petitioner has failed to honour the undertaking given before this Court and has breached the condition on which the sentence was suspended. Consequently, the interim suspension of sentence granted for a period of 30 days stands hereby cancelled. The respondent police are directed to take the petitioner into custody forthwith produce and handover to the Superintendent of Prison where he was detained, to undergo the remaining period of sentence. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. 21.07.2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT Note: Issue order copy on 21.07.2026 To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Mangalamedu. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.8097 of 2026 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. AT Crl. M.P. No. 8097 of 2026 in Crl. A. No. 596 of 2026 21.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis