Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52129 (KAR)

BALARAJ A v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/38958/2025 · 2026-02-02

Suraj Govindaraj

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5844 WP No. 38958 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 38958 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: BALARAJ A. S/O LATE ARALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT 25/1, BMT NO.37, 20TH CROSS, KARAGAPPA GARDEN, SAMPANGIRAMANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 027 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALURU-560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER VASANTNAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BBMP, BANGALORE-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B.S. IYER, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A KHATHA EXTRACT IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF HOUSE PROPERTY BEARING NO. 25/1, NEW NO.37, WARD NO.110, SITUATED AT 20TH CROSS, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR, KARAGAPPA GARDEN, BANGALORE- 560 027, IN LIGHT OF DISMISSAL OF SUIT IN O.S.NO.1741/2008 VIDE ANNEXURE-D WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT AND ETC. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5844 WP No. 38958 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "i) Issue a Khatha extract in the name of petitioner in respect of house property bearing No.25/1 new No.37, ward no.110, situated at 20th Cross Sampangiramanagar, Karagappa Garden, Bangalore-560 027, in light of dismissal of suit in O.S.No.1741/2008 vide Annexure-D with immediate effect. ii) Issue a Writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble court deems fit under the Circumstance of case in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that an offline application for change of khata has not been considered by the respondents and necessary orders passed. 3. It being a requirement that an online application for change of khata is made in online manner accompanied by the necessary documents, I am of the considered view that no fault can be found with the respondents in this regard. As such, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an online application along with necessary documents, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5844 WP No. 38958 of 2025 respondents are directed to consider the said application as and when filed within 30 days of such filing. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31