Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:535 WP No. 39073 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 39073 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. AGGEGOWDA S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/AT ITHANDAHALLI, POST DODDURU KURAPANAHALLI, KOLAR DISTRICT-563162, REP. BY GPA HOLDER, SRI.UDAYKUMAR, S/O AGGEGOWDA, AGED 42 YEARS, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563162.
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:535 WP No. 39073 of 2025
3.
THE ASISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR-563162.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DIST-563114.
5.
SABEERA KHANUN, W/O SHAFIULLA KHAN,
6.
MAHABOOB KHAN S/O SHAFIULLA KHAN,
7.
MUNEER KHAN S/O SHAFIULLA KHAN,
RESPONDENTS 5, 6 & 7 ARE R/AT NO.259, 1ST CROSS, BEHIND PWD QUARTERS, NOORNAGAR, KOLAR, KOLAR DIST-563162. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 13/10/2025 PASSED IN THE REVISION PETITION NO.76/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR VIDE ANNEXURE-K, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO SY.NO.88 MEASURING 0-12 GUNTAS ITHANDAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT IN MR NO.55/85-86, BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:535 WP No. 39073 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition since the petitioner seeks to raise a challenge to the Amendment Act No.6/2025.
2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
4. Office is directed to return the certified copy of Annexure-K to the petitioner while retraining a copy of the same for file.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL