Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5212 (RAJ)

BALURAM KUMHAR S/O SUWA LAL KUMHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5575/2026 · 2026-03-27

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12922] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5575/2026 1. Baluram Kumhar S/o Suwa Lal Kumhar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o V-Kakaraj Khurd P-Darda Turki T-Peeplu Tonk, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj40Ga2099. 2. Gopal Gurjar S/o Kishan Lal Gurjar, R/o Gram Gokulpura Parwan Jaipur, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj14Gp8243. 3. Jeetpal Gurjar S/o Prakash Gurjar, R/o Khandooj Parwan Jaipur, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj47Ga3011. 4. Raja Ram Gurjar S/o Gopal Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ki Dhani Banwara T Peeplu Tonk, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj05Gb2548. 5. Suresh Puniya S/o Doulat Ram Puniya, R/o Manpura Iyala Ka Dhora Ghantiya Bari Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj07Gc2374. 6. Suresh Kumar Jat S/o Bhairu Lal Jat, R/o 47 Adarsh Colony Triveni Road Teh Sil Shahpura Jaipur, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj52Gb4819. 7. Prakash Chnad Gurjar S/o Bansidhar Gurjar, R/o Ward No 04 Goriya Kuva Sanwalpura Tanwran Ajeetgrah Sikar, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj23Gc0780. 8. Dharmendra Kumar Yadav S/o Rambabu Yadav, R/o 48 A Jagdish Colony Niwaru Road Jhotwara Jaipur, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj32Gb9581. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of [2026:RJ-JP:12922] (2 of 4) [CW-5575/2026] Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar. (Rajasthan). 5. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror. (Rajasthan). 6. District Tansport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. (Rajasthan). 7. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Sujangarh, District Ajmer. (Rajasthan). 8. District Transport Officer, Rto Office Tonk, District Tonk. (Rajasthan). 9. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Deedwana, District Nagaur. (Rajasthan). 10. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur. (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surjeet Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 27/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State agrees and submits that the present writ may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra). [2026:RJ-JP:12922] (3 of 4) [CW-5575/2026] 3. Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court are as follows :- “6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days. 7. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 8. It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado. 9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order. 10. In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” [2026:RJ-JP:12922] (4 of 4) [CW-5575/2026] 4. Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:- (i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners are suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners alongwith their counsel concerned shall report to/before the notice issuing authority on 10.04.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and submit the explanation. (ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 5. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /37