Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5212 (KAR)

SRI.K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR v. SMT.SHANTHA

CRP/696/2025 · 2026-04-28

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23594 CRP No. 696 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 696 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI.K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O. LATE K.C. MALLAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT NO.521, 17TH D MAIN, 6E CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 095, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.153, 19TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 095. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMARTH V. AWATI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAYARAJ D.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.SHANTHA W/O. NARAYANA, D/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS Digitally signed by YASHODA K L Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23594 CRP No. 696 of 2025 2. SMT. RAJESHWARI, D/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDING AT NO.78/1, DODDA BELLE COLONY, OPPOSITE ANNEMMA TEMPLE, DODDABELE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 132. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED U/S 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.310/2023 AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.06.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU IN REJECTING IA NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(D) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, 1908 VIDE ANNEXURE-A2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23594 CRP No. 696 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the suit in O.S.No.310/2023 from out of which the present civil revision petition arises has been disposed of by the trial Court and therefore, the prayer made in this petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of as the prayer made in the petition become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9