Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5212 (CAL)

BIPLAB SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2612/2025 · 2026-04-06

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.04.2026 Court No.35. D/L.35. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2612 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with STF Police Station case no. 6 of 2025 dated 14.07.2025 under Sections 111(1)/111(3)/111(4)/111(7)/318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/338/340(1)/340( 2)/61(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 66C/66D of Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 38 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefit and Services) Act, 2016 and Section 14C/14(c) of the Foreigners act, 1946. And In the matter of : Biplab Sarkar. ……Petitioner. Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv, Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Husen Mustafi .....for the Petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Mr. Md. Ezaz Aktar ……for the State. Learned senior advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner and prays for bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the present state of affairs and the process of Administration is in progress for ascertaining in respect of the electoral role, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and as a matter of last chance give opportunity to the State to progress with the case. State, as such, is granted 60 days time to make substantial progress as directed in similar other matters. Petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court after 30th of June, 2026. 2 At this stage, CRM (M) 2612 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)