- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2906 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA D/O. LATE. SREERAMAPPA, W/O. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT.NO.28, CHIKKANAGAVALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 104. 2. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, D/O. LATE. SREERAMAPPA, W/O. SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT.NO.420, SHAKTI NAGARA, SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BETTAHALASURU POST, BENGALURU-562 157. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. PUTTAPPA S/O. LATE SREERAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.264, Digitally signed by BANGALORE ANJANAPPA KRISHNA KUMAR Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BETTAHALASUR POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-562 157. 2. SMT. PADMAMMA, W/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 3. SMT. SHILPA, D/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 4. SMT. GEETHA, D/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 5. MIS. GAYATHRI, D/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. 6. SRI. SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE SREERAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 7. SRI. SHASHI, S/O. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. 8. SRI. AJAY, S/O. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 9. SRI. MANJUNATHA, S/O. LATE SREERAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 10. SRI. VINAY, S/O. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. 11. SRI. ESHWARA, S/O. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. 12. SRI. RAVIKUMAR, S/O LATE SREERAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 13. KUMARI. VINITHA, D/O. RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 14. SRI. PRAKASH, S/O. LATE SREERAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 15. SRI. SRIKANTH, S/O. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS. 16. KUMARI. INDU, D/O. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER NAMELY SRI. PRAKASH. 17. KUMARI. SINDU, D/O. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 FATHER NAMELY SRI. PRAKASH. THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 17 ARE RESIDING AT SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BETTAHALASUR POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-562 157. 18. SMT. DEVAKI, W/O. LATE K. ARMUGUM, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT BETTAHALASUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 157. 19. SMT. KALAMMA, D/O. LATE. SREERAMAPPA, W/O. NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT. SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BETTAHALASURU POST, BENGALURU-562 157. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHUTOSH K.L., ADV. FOR C/R18) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE FO CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.III IN OS NO.280/2025 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI., ALLOWING THE IA NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo reads as under; "The Appellants above named most respectfully submits as follows: 1. That the Appellants have preferred the present appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.11.2025 passed by the Hon'ble I Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, in O.S. No. 280/2025. 2. That during the pendency of the present appeal, the matter has been amicably settled between the Appellants and the Respondents out of court. 3. In view of the said settlement, the Appellants do not wish to pursue the present appeal and seek permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the same. Therefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellants to withdraw the above appeal as settled and not pressed, and be pleased to record the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity." - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5366-DB RFA No. 2906 of 2025 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40