( 2026:JHHC:455 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 7529 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7529 of 2025 1. Sarvan Kumar Singh @ Sharavan Kumar Singh, aged about 49 years, son of Digambar Singh, R/o Village- Kenri Hill Road, DAV Public School Senior Wing, P.O. Korrah, P.S. Korrah, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand) 2. Kaushal Kumar Singh, aged about 55 years, son of Late Ram Lakhan Singh, R/o Village- Gandhi Maidan South Matwari, P.O.- Korrah, P.S. Korrah, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand) 3. Jitendra Kumar Singh, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Ramswarup Singh, R/o Village- Matwari House Compound Gandhi Maidan Matwari, P.O. Korrah, P.S. Korrah, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand) … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ----- 04/09.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.137/2023, registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned C.J.M., Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there is an agreement between the landlord and Veena Sethi for sale of the land and, thereafter, Veena Sethi was put in possession of the land and the house was also constructed there. He further submits that the complaint case has been filed, which has been converted into FIR later on alleging therein that the land is claiming by the legal heirs/successors of Veena Sethi however they have not produced any succession certificate. He then submits that the petitioners who being the successors of Veena Sethi, have not convinced the ( 2026:JHHC:455 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 7529 of 2025 landlord to execute the sale-deed and that can be done through civil suit for specific performance. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the informant appears to be legal heirs/successors of Veena Sethi. 5. Considering that for the agreement the case has been filed and it has been pointed out that Veena Sethi was put into possession and she has also constructed the house and the present complainant claiming themselves to be legal heirs/successors of Veena Sethi and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Hazaribag in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.137/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th January, 2026 Ajay/