Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52098 (MAD)

T.CHINNASAMY v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/27435/2026 · 2026-07-16

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27435 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27435 of 2026 T.Chinnasamy S/o Thandavarayan No 198 Pillaiyar Koil Street, Pu. Konalavadi Post, ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar ulundurpet Taluk, Ulundurpet, kallakurichi District 2. The Taluk Surveyor O/o Taluk office, Ulunderpet, Kallakurichi District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take necessary actions for making sub divisional and issue separate patta to the petitioners hut situated in S. no 334/10 (Old S. No 160/1) Pu Konalavadi village and Post, ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District to the extent of 2 cents in the petitioner name For Petitioner(s): Ms.P.Dhaarani, for Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27435 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.01.2023. 2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 23.01.2023 before the respondents, requesting them for sub-division of the subject property and for issuance of separate patta in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27435 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation filed by the petitioner dated 23.01.2023 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 16-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA To 1. The Tahsildar ulundurpet Taluk, Ulundurpet, kallakurichi District 2. The Taluk Surveyor O/o Taluk office, Ulunderpet, Kallakurichi District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27435 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 27435 of 2026 16-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis