- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2641 WP No. 38801 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 38801 OF 2025 (BDA) BETWEEN: 1. M/S DHRUVIJA NISARGA A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.50, SAROJA CHAMBERS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, NEHRUNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI.M.R.NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O RAMA RAO. 2. SMT. SHASHIKALA N., AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, W/O. SRI.T.KRISHNAMURTHY, RESIDING AT NO.58/40, 40TH CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 082, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, M/S. MANDAKINI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. M.R.NARASIMHAMURTHY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRIDHAR G., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2641 WP No. 38801 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 3. THE TOWN PLANNING MEMBER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.K.P.YASHODA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAYKUMAR M, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 3 HEREIN TO APPROVE THE PLAN FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER VIDE APPLICATION DATED 12.09.2025 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ISSUE THE APPROVAL SOUGHT FOR THEREIN AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2641 WP No. 38801 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to approve the plan filed by petitioner No.2 by way of an application dated 12.09.2025 at Annexure-A. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that an application has been made on 12.09.2025 for sanction of plan in respect of schedule properties and till date no action has been taken. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent - Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) submits that an appropriate decision would be taken as per law. 4. In light of the relief sought for, it would be appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent - BDA to pass appropriate orders on the application seeking approval of plan dated 12.09.2025. Such decision and appropriate orders to be passed within a - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2641 WP No. 38801 of 2025 period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 5. Needless to state, if the respondent-BDA is unable to take a decision, necessarily time for extension will have to be taken before this Court. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR