Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5209 (GAU)

KAJAL YADAV v. STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/292/2026 · 2026-04-28

Michael Zothankhuma, Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010014862026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/292/2026 KAJAL YADAV SON OF RAMESWAR PRASAD YADAV, PATORPAR, DANDARI, BEGUSERI , BIHAR. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS DIPANJALI BORPUJARI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 KAJAL YADAV S/O-RAMESWAR PRASAD YADAV R/O-MALOM TULIYAIMA AWANG PSNAMBOL DIST.IMPHAL WEST MANIPUR VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MRS DIPANJALI BORPUJARI Advocate for : appearing for STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 29/04/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) 1. Heard Ms. D. Borpujari, Learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, Learned APP, Assam, appearing for the State. 2. This is an application for condoning the delay of 584 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant/appellant under section 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 3. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. 4. Accordingly, the delay of 584 days is condoned. 5. IA is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant