Rajkran Kumar @ Rajkaran Kumar @ Rajkaran Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./17412/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5208 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5208 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17412 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rajkran Kumar @ Rajkaran Kumar @ Rajkaran Yadav S/o- Mundrika Yadav R/v- Katrisarai, Ps- Katrisarai Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jagjit Roshan, Advocate For the State : Mr.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 525 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(c), 66(D) of the I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 22.11.2025 at about 09:45 P.M., the police conducted raid at the house of one Guddu Kumar and on seeing the police personnel some persons tried to flee away. Four of them were apprehended while other managed to escape. On being searched, two mobile phones and Rs. 2000/- were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17412 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2
5. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2025.
6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the fact that the petitioner is alleged to have committed cyber fraud and the fact that an iphone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T