Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52051 (MAD)

Sengottaiyan v. The District collector

CMP/18593/2026 · 2026-07-20

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No.18593 of 2026 in WA SR No.117039 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.18593 of 2026 in W.A.No. SR 117039 of 2026 Karuppana Gounder S/o.Pongiya Gounder Thuruchampalaam, Jambai Bhavani, Erode District. Applicant(s) Vs The District Collector 1st Floor, Theeran Chinnamalai Maligai, Perundurai Road, Near Sampath Nagar and Teachers Colony, Opposite Court, Erode 638 011 and 4 others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. K.Sharath Chandran ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No.18593 of 2026 in WA SR No.117039 of 2026 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This application has been filed to grant leave to the applicant to file the writ appeal against the order dated 3.6.2026 passed in W.P.No.1924 of 2026 contending that the fifth respondent has filed the writ petition claiming that there is a pathway in existence over the lands in Survey No.14 leading to Arulmigu Karuppasamy Temple situated in Survey No.13/3 and that the pathway has been blocked using an iron gate. According to the applicant, the fifth respondent claimed the relief without even arraying the applicant and his family members, who are the present owners of the lands in Survey No.14, as parties. The applicant further contends that the learned Single Judge, without adverting to any of such aspects and without affording an opportunity of hearing to the owners of the land, has allowed the writ petition. That apart, there is a civil suit pending before the civil Court qua performance of pooja. ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No.18593 of 2026 in WA SR No.117039 of 2026 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and also for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, we are inclined to grant leave to the applicant to file writ appeal against the order dated 3.6.2026 passed in W.P.No.19244 of 2026. Accordingly, the application is allowed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 20.07.2026 bbr ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis