MANJULATA PRADHAN v. USHA PADHEE, PRINCIPAL SEC., HOUSING AND URBAN DEVLP., BHUBANESWAR
CONTC/1182/2026 · 2026-03-13
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5205 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5205 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC. No.1182 of 2026 Ajit Kumar Pradhan (Dead) & others ….. Petitioners
Represented By Adv. – Mr. S.R. Patnaik -versus- Usha Padhee &another ..... Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. – Mr. A. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 13.03.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging non-implementation of the Court’s order dated 24.07.2025 passed in W.A No.847 of 2024 and the order dated 22.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.12883 of 2015.
4. Considering the submission made, this Court, by providing a last chance, deems it proper to dispose of the Contempt Petition with a direction to the Opposite Party-contemnor to comply with the direction of this Court order dated 24.07.2025 passed in W.A No.847 of 2024 and the order dated 22.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.12883 of 2015, if the same has not been complied with in the meantime, within a period of two months from the date of service of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioners, provided the
Page 2 of 2. operation of order/judgment has not been stayed by higher forum and file compliance report before the Registry of this Court within one week thereafter. It is made clear that in the event the order of the Court is not given effect to within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
5. The CONTC is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Pradeep