Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52005 (MAD)

N.SIVASAMY v. THE REVENUE TAHSILDAR

WP/27894/2026 · 2026-07-16

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27894 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27894 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 30559 OF 2026 N.Sivasamy S/o.late nanjappa gounder, 5/64-B, kothukadu thottam, Attavanai semsampatti, Pogalur – 641697, Annur taluk, coimbatore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Tahsildar Annur Taluk, Coimbatore District. 2. The Firka Surveyor Annur Taluk Office, Annur, Coimbatore District. 3. Ponnammal W/o.Subramanian, nallankattu thottam, A.Komarapalayam - 641653, Annur taluk, coimbatore District. 4. Logeswari W/o.Ramesh, 862-A, Seerakonar nagar, malumichampatti village, chettipalayam - 641201, Coimbatore District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made in F.Line No.7026/0123/12/002651 dated 07.07.2026 (served on 08.07.2026) issued by the 2nd respondent quash the same and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27894 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to work out their remedies in the final decree petition in IA No.1 of 2022 in OS No.600 of 1999 on the file of the learned principal sub court, coimbatore by considering the petitioners representation dated 06.07.2026. For Petitioner(s): Ms.M.Adhi Shree For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt’s counsel for R1 & 2 Order Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government’s counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2. 2. Issue notice to the respondents 3 & 4, returnable by 12.08.2026. Private notice is also permitted. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, there is a partition suit, pertaining to the subject property, pending in OS.No.600/1999. The final decree has to be passed in IA.No.1/2022 in the aforesaid suit. Under these circumstances, at the instance of respondents 3 & 4, the official respondents had issued notice for conducting survey and demarcation of the subject property. However, according to the petitioner, no survey or demarcation can be done prior to the passing of final decree in the aforesaid suit. Hence, this petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27894 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Considering the submission made by the petitioners, it is clear that a suit, pertaining to the subject property is pending and no final decree is passed till date. Under these circumstances, this Court feels that it would be appropriate for the official respondents to conduct survey and demarcation of the subject property after the passing of final decree in the aforesaid suit, otherwise it will create unnecessary disputes between the parties. Therefore, this Court directs the parties to maintain status quo till the next date of hearing. 5. Post this matter on 12.08.2026. 16-07-2026 NSA To 1. The Revenue Tahsildar Annur taluk, coimbatore District. 2. The Firka Surveyor Annur taluk office, annur, coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27894 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 27894 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 30559 OF 2026 16-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis