MR SALEEM TANGAL KADER PALKAD v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
WP/39018/2025 · 2026-01-06
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52002 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52002 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 39018 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
MR. SALEEM TANGAL KADER PALKAD S/O THANGAL KADER PALKAD, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 701, HIMALAYA PRESTIGE, KUNJIBETTU, UDUPI 576102 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK ARM BRANCH, ARM BRANCH MANIPAL, SRD BUILDING,
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025
NEAR HEAD OFFICE ANNEX (MANIPAL) UDUPI-576104
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, ARM BRANCH MANIPAL, HEAD OFFICE 576 104
3.
CHIEF MANAGER/DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, TOWN BRANCH, UDUPI-576104 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 12/11/2025 VIDE NO. 641/ARM/7280/2025-26, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 1, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02/09/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE -E, WITHIN A TIME BOUND PERIOD.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
******
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal (‘DRT’ for short) and seeks interim protection for a period of 30 days.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to precipitate the matter for a period of 30 days.
5. In case if the petitioner files an appeal before the DRT, the DRT is directed not to insist upon the limitation point and proceed with the matter on merits.
6. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
PA | CT:KHV | List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31