Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5200 (GAU)

GOLU MAHATO ALIAS KARAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./960/2026 · 2026-04-26

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010066262026 2026:GAU-AS:5719 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./936/2026 CHANDAN GOALA ALIAS CHANDAN KUMAR GOWALA ALIAS CHANDAN GOWALA S/O LAE SHIV NARAYAN GOWALA R/O WARD NO.10, NUNIAPATTY PO.O.A ND P.S. DHUBRI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H NATH, MR. D GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. A. ALI (FOR INFORMANT),MR. M J BARUAH (FOR INFORMANT) Linked Case : Bail Appln./937/2026 RAM MAHATO D/O LATE SAKALDEEP MAHATO R/O WARD NO. 10 NUNIAPATTY P.O. AND P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. H NATH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : Bail Appln./959/2026 SAGOR GOWALA ALIAS SAGOR ROY S/O LALBABU ROY R/O GOSANI ROAD WARD NO 8 P.S. DINHATI STATE WEST BENGAL DIST. COOCHBEHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. H NATH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : Bail Appln./958/2026 SINKU DEVI W/O RAM MAHATO R/O WARD NO 10 NUNIAPATTY P.O. AND P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI. Page No.# 3/4 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. U S BORA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : Bail Appln./960/2026 GOLU MAHATO ALIAS KARAN S/O RAM MAHATO R/O WARD NO 10 NUNIAPATTY P.O. AND P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. D GOGOI Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 27-04-2026 Page No.# 4/4 Heard Mr. D. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of State respondent. It is submitted by Mr. Gogoi that as per instruction of the petitioners they want to withdraw the case as the petitioners do not want to press the bail application further. In view of this, the prayer is allowed. The petition is accordingly disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant