Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 520 (JHR)

BANSIDHAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/939/2025 · 2026-01-09

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:522 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 939 of 2025 --------- 1. Bansidhar Das, aged 48 years, S/o Sri Govind Das, resident of Village - Bhero, P.O. -Uppar Bahiyar, P.S.- Pathrol, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 2. Mahadeo Mahra, aged 56 years, S/o Sri Kishori Mahra, resident of Village Bardahi, P.O.- Patharadda, P.S.- Sarath, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 3. Pradip Kumar Das, aged 53 years, S/o Sri Baidyanath Das, resident of Village -Dumdumi, P.O.- Amdiha, P.S.- Chitra, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand) 4. Jaikumar Mahra, aged 52 years S/o Sri Naresh Kumar Mahra, resident of Village - Aluwara, P.O.-Sirsa, P.S.- Sarath, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Naman Priyesh Lakra, S/o not known to the petitioner, at present posted as the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O & P.S.- Deoghar, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) ....Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Jayant F. Toppo, G.A.-V Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, A.C. to G.A.-V --------- 03/Dated:-09.01.2026 1. Having regard to Annexure-C to the show cause, no contempt is made out. 2. Accordingly, the instant application stands dimissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) January 9, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 13/01/2026